Stops, Frisks, and Terry Stops Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3750 words

Stops, Frisks, and terrycloth Stops - Research Paper ExampleThis paper leave behind analyze the Terry stop legal divulge and its impact in the society. The paper will too look at constitutional issues that touch on the matter and the impact that they have had. Introduction The issue of stop, frisk and Terry stop is very controversial and has been debated for a long period of time. A Terry stop involves stopping of an individual by a fairness enforcement officeholder for frisking and in some cases a short detention. An individual may be stopped for frisking if they are suspected of having attached or being likely to commit a aversion by a police force enforcement officer. As one affordes a Terry stop, the jurisprudence officer frisks and individual (the suspect) to ensure that the officer is not in danger or other members of the public (Acker & Brody, 2012). A Terry stop is different from an arrest since it takes less(prenominal) time and is accompanied by less legal proce dures. During a Terry Stop, a police officer usu whollyy confirm the details of the suspect and finds out whether they have a criminal record or outstanding fines or arrest warrants that have been issued against them. Groups that represent both sides of the argument present their debates which sound justified. Records of shame statistics show that there has been an increase in hatreds that are committed completely over the country. People all over the world feel that is up to the government to introduce measures that lead to a reduction of crime levels. Stop, frisks and Terry stops is one of the ways that was introduced by the government to try and curb crime levels all over the country. Law enforcers feel that prevention of crimes consumes fewer resources and saves more lives for minimal inconvenience if any to those that undergo the Terry stops. Discussions Stops, Frisks, and Terry Stops affect many individuals in the United States and perceptions on the government and law enfo rcement officers. This constitutional issue also affects the constitutional functions of individuals. Terry stop and frisk involves detention by police if they are suspicious that an individual has been involved in committing a crime. The Terry stop and frisk law was introduced in 1968 after the Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S 1 (1968) lawcourt decision that was made by the Supreme court in the United States. The decision also authorized the police to conduct searches on the outer garments of the suspect if they have articulable suspicion that the suspect is armed and dangerous. The court authorized law enforcers to being able to ride out an individual who they suspect is involved in committing a crime. Law enforcement officers also have the legal right to search the individual that they have detained. In some cases, the law enforcers ability feel that the suspect might be in possession of a weapon, and may be planning to use in arrange to commit a crime. The rationale that causes the l aw enforcers to feel that the individual is likely to commit a crime should be reasonable. For example, a suspect might look overly nervous yet there is no evident reason why they should appear so. Such behavior might be an indication that much(prenominal) an individual is about to commit a crime. The law authorizes police officers to seize any form of mordant that they would find on a suspect while conducting the frisking. However there are some conditions in the frisking of the suspect (Acker & Brody, 2012). The frisking should be limited to the outer clothing of the